Collection of letters to Clark from leading men of New York State, including several Supreme Court justices, (Finch, Ingram, Scott etc.) There is also material written by Clark including retained copies of letters from Clark to Presidents Theodore Roosevelt and William Howard Taft, retained copies of eulogies on Roosevelt and Wilson, retained galley of an address to the New York Bar Association, as well as other related papers and ephemera, approximately 30 items.
Clark graduated from Yale (1878) along with
William Howard Taft, a life-long friend. Appointed and thereafter elected to
New York Supreme Court, 1900, 1901, 1915. Appointed to the Appellate Division
of the Supreme Court (First Department) 1905; reappointed 1910 and 1915. Appointed
Presiding Justice of the Appellate Division, 1916-1926. Appointed Referee for
Life of New York Courts, 1930.
Sample Quotes:
“Hawkins, Delafield & Sturgis, New
York, February 6, 1899, to Theodore Roosevelt, Albany, New York
Hon Theodore Roosevelt,
Albany, New York,
My
dear Roosevelt,
I see in the papers the name of my friend John Proctor Clarke, suggested
as a possible candidate for the vacant position of Surrogate. I have known Mr.
Clarke for a good many years, and although a democrat, wish to say that in my
opinion he would be in every way fitted to fill so important a position. He is
a good lawyer and hardworking, and his earnest work for his party deserves
recognition.
I write this letter between ourselves, as a friend of Clarke’s. I do not
wish to appear as a member of the Democratic party urging upon the Governor of
the State the appointment of a Republican office-holder, but simply write to
say a good word for a friend… Robert Sturgis”
“Jamestown, North Dakota, Sept. 13th,
1900
John Proctor Clarke Esq.
My Dear Sir,
I enclose you a good campaign document which speaks for itself. It was
unnecessary to publish notices of this kind during Cleveland’s administration.
I want you and Teddy “to keep off the grass and not interfere with my business
arrangements”. I am going west today and will try and keep ahead of you. I cant
get a customers attention within one hundred miles of his town. I want you to
work your “own side if the street.” I have dates on this road to
Portland & Seattle. I am whooping it up for Leeser in the day time &
Mack & Teddy at night. I will look after Wash., Or., & Cal. – and my
boy will take care of Kans. Neb. Col. Wy. North & South Dacotah so I guess
the west is pretty safe.
Hope to see you in NY about xmas & hope to be able to rejoice with
those that ought to rejoice.
I shall be in Butte Sunday next. I will give you my proxy to vote in
Nov. … W. M. Leeser”
“New York, Supreme Court Judges Chambers, Court House Chambers Street,
Dec. 18th 1900
My
dear John,
Your friend Roosevelt has a chance now to show whether he appreciates
your friendship. I hope you will at least give him the opportunity to appoint
you in Beekman’s place.
I know that you are not attracted by the prospect of a judicial position
but really you ought not to let such a chance pass. There is at least an equal
chance that whoever is appointed now, may be elected next fall for a full term,
and even if you should not be a year on the bench of this court, would not hurt
but rather help you professionally.
You must realize that while your political work of last year have
certainly given you a reputation as a public speaker, yet your vert preeminence
in that regard has led many people to believe that your abilities lie more
markedly in that direction than in the direction of a lawyer.
With a year on the bench you would have the opportunity to show to the
legal world the capacity, knowledge and good judgment as a lawyer that I know
so well that you possess.
At the end of the year, even if you should not be re-elected, you would
be able to return to practice with a high reputation as a lawyer, as well as a
speaker. With this combination of qualities generally acknowledged (as they
inevitably would be) your successful professional career would be assured.
Believe me, this is an opportunity
which you should not permit to pass.
Yours Sincerely,
Frances M. Scott”
“Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department, New York, Oct. 27th,
1908
My
dear Theodore:-
Ten years ago this day we celebrated your birthday on a train in central
New York while you were conducting that brilliant campaign in which you won for
yourself the Governorship of the state – What crowded years these have
been for you. What splendid service you have given to your country – and to the
world. Through it all I have followed with the keenest interest every act and
every word – but on the side lines – where you put me – Can you realize what it
has meant for me to be a passive observer in this campaign where my class mate
and friend of thirty four years has been nominated as your choice for your
successor? Recalling our tours and our speeches can’t you imagine how I would
like to swing my shilellah in the middle of the fight? But I have had to do the
work you put me to – Have become one of those meticulous persons who do not
seem to stand so high in your regard as the red blooded fighters among whom I
fondly recall, I was numbered once upon a time.
You reach today with vigor unabated, with youth still in your blood,
with hope and ideal and high resolve undimmed a half century of achievement. I
send you a the best I have in congratulation for what has been done and best
wishes for the coming years.
You have reached today a half century of achievement Fifty years young
indeed. Vigor untouched ideals unspoiled hope and high resolve undimmed you
stand as the best exemplar for the youth of this land – A President indeed a
leader of thought and conscience and practical works. – I send the best I have
in congratulations for what has been done and best wishes for the coming years
…”
Letter of recommendation for Julius Marshuetz Mayer (1865-1925) for an
appointment to the United States District Court, Southern District of New York
“Supreme Court Appellate Division First
Department, New York, December 22nd 1911
Dear Mr. President:-
In response to your request for my opinion
as to the professional qualifications of Mr. Julius M. Mayer for judicial
office, I beg to state that I have known Mr. Mayer for many years. He served
for a time, upon appointment by the Mayor, as Justice of the Court of Special
Sessions, resigning some years before the expiration of his term, and later,
upon election, as Attorney General of the State. He tried cases and argued
motions before me when sitting in the Trial and Special Terms of the Supreme
Court and has argued cases before the
Appellate Division, both while he was Attorney General, and also when out of
office for private litigants. His court work has been especially notable for
his clear and candid statements of the facts and his clear presentation of the
legal points involved.
His attitude to the Court has been one of absolute fairness. He is a well equipped lawyer, is ambitious and industrious. He is logical, even tempered and fair minded. His character and standing at the bar are excellent. We are glad to have him appear before us as his arguments and briefs elucidate instead of befogging the issues presented …”