Quarto, 4 pages, posted from “Washington Square” New York, “March 29,” no year given, likely 1850’s. The letter writer signs their name “Enquirer” and inquires about Bennett’s opinion on the presumed upcoming American delegation to Paris, France, perhaps concerning some political matter.
James
Gordon Bennett (1795-1872)
James Gordon Bennett was the
founder, editor and publisher of the New
York Herald and a major figure in the history of American newspapers.
Bennett was born to a
prosperous Roman Catholic family in Newmill, Banffshire, Scotland, Great
Britain. At age 15, Bennett entered the Roman Catholic seminary in Aberdeen,
where he remained for four years. After leaving the seminary, he read
voraciously on his own and traveled throughout Scotland.
In 1819, he joined a friend
who was sailing to North America. After four weeks they landed in Halifax, Nova
Scotia, where Bennett briefly worked as a schoolmaster till he had enough money
to sail south to Portland, Maine, where he again taught school in the village
of Addison, moving on to Boston, Massachusetts by New Year's Day, 1820. He
worked in New England as a proofreader and bookseller before the Charleston Courier in Charleston, South
Carolina hired him to translate Spanish language news reports, so he briefly
relocated to The South. He moved back north to New York City in 1823, where he
worked first as a freelance paper writer and then, assistant editor of the New York Courier and Enquirer, one of
the oldest newspapers in the city
In May 1835, Bennett began
the New York Herald after years of
failing to start a paper. After only a year of publication, in April 1836, it
shocked readers with front–page coverage of the grisly murder of prostitute
Helen Jewett; Bennett got a scoop and conducted the first-ever newspaper
interview for it. In business and circulation policy, The Herald initiated a cash–in–advance policy for advertisers, which
later became the industry standard. Bennett was also at the forefront of using
the latest technology to gather and report the news, and added pictorial
illustrations produced from woodcuts. In 1839, Bennett was granted the first
ever exclusive interview to a sitting President of the United States, the
eighth occupant, Martin Van Buren (1782–1862, served 1837–1841).
By the time Bennett turned
control of the New York Herald over
to his son James Gordon Bennett Jr. (1841–1912), at age 25 in 1866, it had the
highest circulation in America but would soon face increasing competition from
Greeley's Tribune and soon in the
next decades, from Joseph Pulitzer's New
York World, William Randolph Hearst's New
York Journal, along with Henry J. Raymond's The New York Times. However, under the younger Bennetts'
stewardship, the paper slowly declined under the increasing stiff competition
and changing technologies in the late 19th century and, after his 1912 death,
it was merged a decade later with its former arch-rival, the New York Tribune in 1924, becoming the New York Herald Tribune for another 42
years meeting with considerable success and reputation in its near last
half-century, until finally closing in 1966–1967.
The author of this letter,
written to Bennett, is possibly James Watson Webb (1802-1884). The letter is
signed simply “Enquirer,” it is
unclear who the author is, but the New
York Courier and Enquirer, properly called the Morning Courier and New-York Enquirer, was a daily
broadsheet newspaper published in New York City from June 1829 until June 1861,
when it was merged into the New York
World. Throughout its existence it was edited by newspaper publisher James
Watson Webb. It was closely connected with the rise and fall of the United
States Whig Party and was noted for its careful coverage of New York Harbor
shipping news and its close attention to speeches and events in the United
States Congress.
“Washington
Square
Sir,
I
fear you are becoming so much engrossed with the political conditions of the
world as to forget the social. I should like to bring you back, as of yore, to
the social and to elicit your opinion upon many important points – one thing –
what are we Americans in future to do in Paris? Or are we to go there at all
except to deliver lectures on self-government and republicanism, and what is to
become of Louis Philipps, the young Duke and Duchess? Will he again in his own
words return to the ‘Bundleing System.’ On the occasion of your own
presentation to him a year ago, when he seemed quite persuaded he had met you
before, His Majesty remarked to a young Tennessean standing near you of whom he
was making particular enquiries about the present condition of his state, ‘Ah
changed greatly changes since my time.’ Sketching then graphically his route
and privations, ‘In my time’ continued the King “We walked on foot in
Tennessee, were glad to bite a [hoc] cake in a log cabin and slept three in a
bed. We followed the Bundleing System and how well it be with their Highness
the Dukes D’Nemours – D’Aumala and Montpensier’ on that presentation occasion
notwithstanding the marked civility of the King and Queen and all the Duchesses
to the American gentlemen, those young worthies friended by D’Nemours passed
the whole American line without even the civil nod and the same thing occurred
at two years before and now by the laws of their own land they are as flat down
democrats as any log cabin man in Tennessee. Again, I would ask what are we
Americans, especially we of the ‘Upper Ten’ to do in Paris?
Hitherto
the grand idea of there was sorting with Royalty and nobility has been
inducement enough for many of us to brave the seas and sea sickness and even to
open splendid hotels in the Toubourgh St. Germaine, a late letter in your paper
makes mention of such one fitted up in splendid style then and there existing
and describes a grand ball just given by the beautiful hostess, so beautiful
you will remember as to have been the belle at last winter’s court Ball at the
Fuilveries. Your correspondent speaks of counts and dukes and duchesses by
scores gracing the lady’s salon – and is it so that in all time to come La
Belle Paris is only to be the abode of dirty democrats? Do give us your
opinion.
Enquirer”