Quarto, 4 pages, formerly folded, in very good, clean and legible condition.
“My
dear friend,
I thank you for your prompt and
friendly information of the result of the election, of which Br. Baker was also
good enough to inform me by the same mail. At present, however, I find myself
more engaged about the report of the Committee of Foreign relations, than
anything else, and therefore you must pardon me for speaking once more of it.
The letters which you have already received unfold pretty fully my views, which
I am sorry to find differ essentially from those of yourself & my friend W.
Smith. I assent unequivocally to all you say as to the falsehood, partiality,
and unmanly language of the Committee, as to the pother made by them about
defence, as to the inefficiency of the means proposed, and most of the other
remarks made by you upon that blustering feeble production. But I cannot agree
with you in your conclusions, because it appears to me they involved what Chase
used to be so fond of talking of, a non sequitur. “You have used indecorous
language – there fore we will not aid you in defending the country.”
“The country is now wholly without the
means of defence therefore we call upon you to declare war.”
“You have a just cause of war against
France; therefore make an immediate declaration against England.”
“Your means of defence as you propose
them are not ample enough – we admit most of them may be useful but they should
have gone further; therefore we will vote for none of them.”
My dear friend I cannot do wrong
because the democrats are sinners, and in my endeavours to fulfill the wishes of
a party, I cannot forget the interests of my Country. What is the situation
that we are in? About the unhappy causes of it you and I can never differ, but
what is the situation of the country? The Government unhappily stand
pledged to France. They will not break faith (as they would term it) with her.
England perseveres in her orders in council, and, as you see from the late
negotiations, will not revoke them, even upon an undeniable repeal of the
French decrees, with out obtaining certain other prerequisites, which it is
generally certain never can be obtained from France. In this state of things what are we the
Federalists to do? Shall we invite the government to yield on these points
to England, and embroil themselves with France? Would they be willing to do
this, or would the public sentiment at all accompany us in such a request? Is
it our policy to continue the felo de se practice of holding ourselves up by
intemperate language as British partisans, and increasing against a popular
prepossession, thereby diminishing our numbers, and our little remaining
influence? Will we act with the temperate wisdom of discreet politicians, to
urge in direct terms war (preferable as we may alternately believe it to be to
a long continuation of the present system) at this time? Could we, if disposed
to do so, conceal the real object of such a proposition from our political
opponents? Could we (certainly we could not) carry with us the opinions of our
own party? Can we object to a gradual augmentation of the means of preparation,
consistently with our professions in a state of things having even a tendency
to war? What shall we say after having voted against army, navy, militia,
volunteers, arming of merchantmen & in favor of a renewal of the
nonimportation restrictions?
But my friend inefficient as you and I
consider the proposed increases, our federalists from the eastward are many of
them of a different opinion – Some of them think they go to far, and will not
vote for them or their full extent, as for instance the 10,000 addl troops,
increase of navy &c on that ground.
As at present advised, I cannot but
concur in the opinion of my friend Quincy & others, that political
consistency, sound party policy, genuine patriotism, and a fair calculation of
consequences, all require my vote in favour of the resolutions of this course
the democrats are very apprehensive – they anxiously wish us to oppose them,
knowing they can carry them or anything else in despite of our speeches or
votes. Some of them are disposed to carry them further than the Comee,
so as to drive us by that means into opposition. They dread our doing anything
that will have a tendency to remove from us the imputation of being tories
& British partisans, you will see no speech from me on this subject, our
friends inclining to think a silent vote altogether on our side of the house
preferable. I am not of that opinion, but unless something occurs to change our
views, will acquiesce.
And now having sufficiently fatigued you
with this subject I have only to say that our friends Hopkinson’s ideas
coincide on this subject much was nearly with my own than yours do, and I …
[here the letter ends]