folio, 4 pages, possibly a retained draft, with extensive corrections, paper slightly browned, small portion of paper missing at lower edge, affecting some text on last two lines of pages 1-3, else in good, clean and legible condition.
Thomas Moore (1760-1822) was a Quaker
farmer, cabinetmaker and skilled engineer – who, in 1802, invented an ice box
to transport butter from Georgetown (District of Columbia) to his home in
Montgomery County, Maryland. His device was a tin box placed inside an oval
cedar tub, the gaps between box and tub filled with ice, the whole then covered
with a hinged lid and insulated on the outside with rabbit fur and coarse
woolen cloth. He displayed the box to President Jefferson, a lover of novel
inventions, who not only granted Moore a patent for his “Refrigerator” but
bought one himself that was long used at Monticello. Moore recorded his
accomplishment, and the new name he had given his invention, in a pamphlet
published the following year, entitled: An Essay on the Most Eligible
Construction of Ice-houses: Also, a description of the Newly Invented Machine Called
the Refrigerator. (A rarity; the last copy at auction sold in the Streeter
Sale, 1969, for $ 175).
Moore later established cotton mills in
Maryland, oversaw construction projects on rivers and canals near Washington,
D.C., and was appointed by Jefferson one of three commissioners to begin work
on the first major highway in the United States to be built by the federal
government, stretching from the Potomac to the Ohio River. At the time of his
death, he was chief Engineer for the Virginia Board of Public Works.
Moore’s national reputation was such
that Evans, President of the Schuylkill Navigation Company, consulted him about
the best means of improving navigation along the most important Pennsylvania
river canal. Moore responded with this long, somewhat rambling letter, which
reads in part:
“Respected Friend,
…I
think the plan you purpose to accept for the improvement of the navigation of
the Schuykill is on the whole a judicious one. The erection of dams across the
River to be passed by a Lock at one end is a plain business in which I presume
you will find no difficulty, but the selection of proper Sites and… the proper
direction and length to using dams and… Jetties… will require the exercise of
sound Judgment…I believe it will be found in practice that the plan of placing
them alternately on the two sides of the River must be abandoned. When a dam is
extended quite across a River the powers of art fairly overcome the resistance
of the Stream by the strength of materials and the address by which they are
combined, but in those practical kinds of operations, we must go hand in hand
with nature or be content to have our views continually thwarted… if for the
sake of producing regularity in our works we should project a Jettie from the
lower end of a concave shore (where the laws that govern fluids in motion
always produce a concentration of
current) in order to effect a passage for boats on the convex side,
nature would laugh at our puny efforts by filling our canal…with sand… When the
dams or Jetties are revised on Grand bottoms, the artificially excited current
is always liable to scoop out the bed of the Sluice and deposit the contents
somewhere at a short distance below which may cause an impediment where none
existed before…The shape of the River and the materials of which the bottom is
composed will of course be…considerations in determining the sites and shape of
the works….I am not in possession of sufficient data to determine accurately
the relative differences between propelling a boat by Setting Poles and…a
toeing line but know it is very great… in favor of toeing. I have long been of
opinion though I have never seen it tried that in many cases… instead of a
toeing path, let a Chain be made fast in the bottom, a boats length above the
rapid, and also at the lower end but of greater length than this distance
between those points so as to lie slack on the bottom to be hooked up by boat
hooks. I know of no way in which muscular power can be better applied…This plan
would generally be less expensive than a toeing path. I have no doubt from what I have seen… that
six men with such a contrivance in a good boat would draw up as many Tons
through a Sluice of one foot full in a hundred without the least difficulty and
probably with but five minutes delay. It
would be very difficult and indeed impossible to describe on paper the best
mode of overcoming every obstacle that will occur in the prosecution of such a
work but a perfect knowledge of the principles… which govern the direction and
deposition of ponderous bodies torn from their beds and put in motion by a
current , proved by observation on what actually takes place in every stream,
will go far towards giving… the best direction that the case admit of, but in many instances must be judged of on
the spot. A plan recommended by me some years ago for the construction of…dams
has …lately been introduced on the Connecticut River which is…perhaps of all
others the cheapest and probably none can… answer the purpose better.... information
contained in this Letter will probably fall short of thy expectations but is
all that occurs at present relative to a general outline which is all that can
be given at a distance. If the hints communicated are of any value, they are at
the service of the Schuykill Navigation Company.” [sic]